Diamond Exit Raises Speculation Of Investment-Bank Split

When Robert Diamond took over Barclays Plc (BARC)’s shrinking securities unit in 1997 he vowed to turn the business into a leading global firm.

Former Barclays CEO Robert Diamond

Fifteen years later, his success in creating a top investment bank, whose profit reached $4.7 billion in 2011, may hasten its split from the lender after the London-based bank admitted to trying to rig global interest rates. Diamond quit as Barclays’s chief executive officer yesterday and hours later Chief Operating Officer Jerry del Missier followed.

The departure of Diamond may presage a reorganization of Barclays after regulators in the U.K. and the U.S. pointed to the need for change at the company. The interest rate debacle is intensifying political pressure in the U.K. to build higher walls between banks’ consumer lending and investment-bankingdivisions to protect savers and taxpayers.

“Now is a very sensible time to pause, draw breath, assess what’s happened and look again at this question of a ring fence or separation,” said Clive Hollick, a former CEO of United News & Media Group Plc and member of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

Barclays was hit by a record 290 million-pound ($455 million) fine last week for rigging the London Interbank Offered Rate, a benchmark for more than $360 trillion of securities. Diamond, as CEO of the investment bank from 1997 through 2010, oversaw the unit where Libor rates were submitted.

Costs, Complexities

The U.K. Treasury plans to implement recommendations of the Independent Commission on Banking, which proposed financial firms should build firewalls between their consumer and investment-banking operations. Bank of England GovernorMervyn King said on June 29 the Libor revelations reinforced the argument for implementing the proposals as soon as possible.

“Barclays management should begin talking to people about the costs and complexities around a break up, the potential scale of U.S. liabilities” related to Libor, “and how it can insulate itself,” said Gareth Hunt, head of European research at Canaccord Genuity in London. There may be assets like U.K. consumer banking which can be ring-fenced or split off, he said.

U.K. regulators are weighing whether to start a criminal probe into Libor-fixing and Diamond, 60, will be questioned by British lawmakers on the Treasury Select Committee today.

In a sign of worsening relations between Barclays and its regulators, the company released a note yesterday of a 2008 call purporting to show that Paul Tucker, then the central bank’s markets director, hinted the firm could cut its Libor rates.

Libor Rates

“Tucker stated that the levels of calls he was receiving from Whitehall were ‘senior’ and that while he was certain we did not need advice, that it did not always need to be the case that we appeared as high as we have recently,” Diamond said in an Oct. 30, 2008 e-mail to then CEOJohn Varley and Del Missier.

Diamond didn’t believe he had received any instruction or that he gave any order to Del Missier to lower the lender’s submissions, Barclays said in evidence to lawmakers yesterday. Del Missier, 50, concluded that the Bank of England had instructed the firm not to keep Libor so high and mistakenly instructed employees to lower their submissions, Barclays said.

A Bank of England spokesman declined to comment on the document, as did a Barclays official.

Damage to the franchise he helped create prompted Diamond to go, the banker said in a statement yesterday. The American was the chief architect of Barclays’s expansion into investment banking, creating a business that had 24,000 employees at the end of last year, more than three times as many as when he took over the unit.

Higher Ranking

The division, known until March as Barclays Capital, earned pretax profit of 2.97 billion pounds last year, or almost half of the bank’s total. Barclays ranks fifth in advising on global mergers this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The firm wasn’t in the top 20 in 2007, the year before it bought the North American operations of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

“Diamond’s been incredibly successful in turning what was a minor player into a top tier investment bank,” said George Godber, a fund manager who helps oversee about $250 million at Matterley Asset Management in London, and doesn’t hold Barclays stock. “Now you’re likely to see political pressure mount for a separation of Barclays’s investment-banking unit.”

Diamond, a year after joining Barclays de Zoete Wedd, took the helm and steered the firm through the sale of its money- losing European equities unit to focus on bonds, loans and foreign exchange.

It was a rocky start. In 1998, Barclays Capital reported a loss after bets on Russia soured amid the country’s devaluation.

Lehman Purchase

Diamond, who rose through the fixed-income trading ranks at New York-based Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse First Boston before Barclays, continued to hire and expand the business. He lost out on the CEO job to Varley, 56, and became president of the bank in 2005.

Diamond propelled Barclays into the top ranks in equities and mergers by leading the bid to buy the Lehman operations when the New York-based firm collapsed at the height of the subprime- mortgage crisis. He struck a deal to acquire the North American investment-banking business of the bankrupt firm for $1.75 billion and then embarked on a hiring spree to add stock underwriting and merger advisory businesses and bankers in Europe and Asia to match its standing in the U.S.

Not everyone advocates a change of direction.

“I think they should sit back and relax,” said Christopher Wheeler, a London-based analyst at Mediobanca SpA. “The investment bank is a top three in the world, no argument about it. Why on earth, having made this investment and a very good acquisition of Lehman Brothers, would someone come in and change their strategy?”

Break-Up Potential

Barclays made it through the credit crisis without direct government support. Since then, tightening global capital standards and Europe’s sovereign debt woes have kept investment- banking profitability below pre-crisis levels.

After becoming CEO of Barclays at the start of 2011, Diamond vowed to boost return on equity to 13 percent. The measure stood at 6.6 percent at the end of last year. Net income for 2011 fell to 3 billion pounds from 3.56 billion pounds as investment-banking revenue shrank.

Barclays has dropped 36 percent in London trading since Diamond took over, compared with a 12 percent decline in HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), Britain’s largest bank, leading to impatience among some investors.

“Their leverage is still high, they’ve got regulatory worries, they’ve got capital worries, you can’t look at them and say it’s a conservative investment,” said John Smith, a senior fund manager at Brown Shipley & Co., which manages 2.3 billion pounds, including Barclays shares. “I would like to see them break the bank in two so you have a low-risk retail bank offering savings and loans and an investment bank where they’re using their own money to take on a lot of risk.”

(Curtsey : Bloomberg)

Rupesh Yatesh Dalal
Head Research Department


Website : www.marketcalls.net
Facebook : www.facebook.com/marketcalls.net
Twitter : @marketcallsnet
Yahoo Messenger : rupeshydalal@yahoo.com
Email : info@marketcalls.net

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: